Up with Socialism By Kelson Maynard and Jack Miller
Socialism as a political
and economic and social theory aims to advocate and establish policies for the control
of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of goods and services. These policies are regulated by the community. The community is represented by the state. The state is
defined as the political entity that possesses sovereignty over a
defined geographic area and population. It exercises control through legal and
institutional structures. The state's functions are broad and encompass the
creation and enforcement of laws, maintaining order, protecting property
rights, defending sovereignty, and providing public goods and services. The
state is a permanent and enduring entity. It remains even as governments
change.
Government on the other
hand is the organization or system through which the state exercises its
authority and performs its functions.
The government is made up of institutions and officials that create,
enforce, and interpret laws. It typically consists of three branches or
divisions: the executive, legislative, and judicial. The government's functions
include policymaking, administration, enforcement of laws, and providing public
services.
Socialistic state
policies emphasize governmental control over economic resources and seek to
promote social and economic equality. This means that government intervention
in markets, redistribution of wealth, and the provision of public services such
as healthcare, education, and welfare, is imperative. The idea is to reduce the
disparities between different social classes and ensure that all classes of
society can benefit from economic prosperity, or all bear the burden in times
of economic downturn.
Lately, there have been
narratives about the collapse of Socialist ideology and policies. That the assassination of removal of several
leaders in the world who articulated and worked to establish socialist theories
and praxis, that served as a template for political, economic, and social
development in the Caribbean, Latin America, and Africa, marked the end of
socialist ideas and experiments in the aforementioned areas. Why would a theory
and praxis typically designed to reduce economic inequalities and promote
social welfare through governmental control over production, distribution, and
exchange be abandoned? What is the option? Capitalism? Has capitalism fulfilled
these common socialist policies:
·
Universal Healthcare:
Providing healthcare services free or at a reduced cost to all citizens.
·
Education for All:
Free or subsidized education, from primary through tertiary levels, to ensure
equal access to educational opportunities.
·
Public Ownership:
Nationalizing key industries and services, such as transportation, energy, agriculture,
and telecommunications, to operate them in the public interest rather than for
profit.
·
Welfare Programs:
Implementing comprehensive social safety nets, including unemployment benefits,
disability benefits, pensions, and parental leave.
·
Progressive Taxation:
Levying higher taxes on wealthy individuals and corporations to fund public
services and reduce income inequality.
·
Minimum Wage Laws:
Establishing a living wage to ensure that all workers can meet their basic
needs.
·
Workers' Rights:
Protecting labor rights through strong regulations on working conditions, the
right to unionize, and collective bargaining.
·
Affordable Housing:
Providing good quality public housing or subsidizing housing costs to ensure
that everyone has access to safe and affordable homes.
·
Environmental Policies:
Implementing stringent environmental protection laws and investing in renewable
energy to reverse environmental degradation, promote sustainable development
and community health.
·
Public Services:
Expanding and enhancing public services like transportation, childcare, and
recreational facilities to be accessible to all members of society.
These socialistic
policies generally aim to create a more equitable and just society by
addressing disparities and ensuring that all citizens have access to essential
services and opportunities. Can the same be said for capitalism?
The prevailing discourse
of capitalism is to under mind humanism because capitalism is more important to
maintain than spreading real democracy for all throughout society. Capitalism
promotes white patriarchy which must supersede over diversity and inclusivity
of citizens that do not ascend to this white patriarchal system. Overall,
capitalism is not conducive to elevate social or economic equity from the
bottom up; since it is design to promote individualism and to maintain a caste
hierarchy that favors the powerful and the elites at the pinnacle of society.
Social theory and
development in the Global South have been met with skepticism by Western
Capitalism and some post-colonial heads of State and the elites in these areas,
leaving the vast majority of young people, children, women and the elderly
lacking an essential quality of life for themselves. Thus, the development of
Socialism have been de-railed in much of the Global South.
Currently, systems of
capitalism ramp down and suppress dissent that goes against the State to
protect the property class and its relationship to occupation, apartheid and
imperialistic philosophies. In the United States, one hundred forty million
citizens are poor and low income. That comprises forty-one percent of the total
population of three hundred forty million citizens. The top ten percent earners
control sixty-eight percent of wealth in the country, in contrast to the bottom
fifty percent earners who control a meager two-point five percent (2.5) of
total wealth.
Social theory and
humanism are intertwined to provide the social metrics from healthcare through
public services as described above to all in society. Whereas, capitalism has
failed miserably these same metrics in all faucets for the majority seeking
essential life principles and fundamental humane human conditions of food ,
clothing and shelter.
Comments
Post a Comment